-
P1 · Threshold, not slope
Among people with equal stated intention, the probability of starting rises non-linearly as friction falls: a fixed reduction in steps produces a larger change near the middle of the range than at either end.
Falsified if the relationship between number of required steps and start rate is linear, or its largest change is at an extreme.
-
P2 · Identity alone does not close the gap
Strengthening identity statements (“I am a writer”) without changing friction or support produces a smaller change in action than an equal-effort reduction in friction.
Falsified if identity-only interventions match or exceed friction-reduction interventions on observed behaviour in a pre-registered comparison.
-
P3 · Feedback steepens, it does not shift
Faster feedback raises action rates mainly for people whose intention is already near threshold, and has little effect on people far below it.
Falsified if the effect of faster feedback is the same size across low, middle and high baseline-intention groups.
-
P4 · Emotional resistance is concentrated at the start
Self-reported dread is higher in the minutes before a first action than during it, and falls after the first visible act.
Falsified if momentary dread ratings show no drop after initiation, or peak during the task rather than before it.
-
P5 · Support substitutes for intention
A fixed amount of structural support (a scheduled slot, a partner, a prepared space) can compensate for lower intention: people with lower intention and high support act at rates comparable to people with higher intention and low support.
Falsified if support raises action only for already-high-intention participants and never offsets low intention.
-
P6 · Turning-away points are predictable
People can name, in advance, the moment they usually abandon an intention, and that named moment matches where abandonment is later observed more often than chance.
Falsified if pre-named abandonment points do not match observed ones above a chance baseline.